Pinning down exactly when and where the Osmo 360 II ships turns out to be harder than it should be. PetaPixel and The Verge both report worldwide shipping beginning September 15 at €589 (PetaPixel; The Verge). T3's review, published the same day, tells a different story: it says the camera already launched in the UK on September 2, then separately states an official UK launch lands November 2, priced at £509 for the Standard Combo and £639 for the Adventure Combo, with European standard pricing listed at €599.

None of the supplied reporting explains the gap between those dates. Until DJI clarifies through its own regional product pages, treat the September 15 date and €589 price as PetaPixel's and The Verge's figures, and the UK and European numbers as reported separately by T3.

Several headline specs match across every source:

• Weight: 183g (T3; PetaPixel)
• Waterproofing: rated to 10 metres (T3)
• Internal storage: 105GB, carried over from the original Osmo 360 (The Verge)
• Max image resolution: 120-megapixel 360° HDR photos (T3; PetaPixel)
• Battery: 100 minutes of recording at 8Kp30, with an 80% recharge in 22 minutes; an optional Battery Extension Rod adds another 180 minutes (PetaPixel)
• Audio: a built-in four-microphone array with wind-noise reduction, plus compatibility with DJI's Mic 3, Mic 2, Mic Mini 2S, Mic Mini 2, and Mic Mini via DJI OsmoAudio (PetaPixel)

The sensor description is where sources start to diverge. PetaPixel relays DJI's marketing language calling it "the industry's first advanced 1-inch square HDR image sensor" that keeps the same field of view as a traditional 1-inch rectangular sensor. The Verge describes the same imaging hardware as "the same dual 1/1.1-inch square sensors as the original." The two outlets describe the sensor differently, and neither report reconciles the difference. For owners of the original Osmo deciding whether to upgrade, that matters: if the underlying sensor hasn't actually changed, the case for buying again rests on the lens system, frame rates, and processing, not on new capture hardware.

Video capture has a similar wrinkle. T3 and The Verge report 8K at 60fps as the camera's 360° maximum, up from 50fps on the original. PetaPixel separately lists "8Kp120 slow-motion video" among the capture modes. Whether that's a distinct mode or a specification mismatch isn't clear from the available reporting. Panoramic slow motion is more straightforward: 4K jumps from 120fps to 240fps, per T3.

T3 calls the user-replaceable lens system the biggest change in the Osmo 360 II, and for owners of the original camera, it's the upgrade that matters most. A UK Lens Kit will retail for £35, T3 reports, letting owners swap out a scratched or cracked lens rather than retire an otherwise working camera. The design could lower the cost of repairing lens damage over the life of the camera, though the available reporting doesn't quantify by how much.

DJI claims 14.5 stops of dynamic range in 360° recording, aided by a new AI noise-reduction algorithm called AI SuperNight 2, plus 10-bit color and D-Log M support across every video format, per PetaPixel. That's a meaningful jump for a 360 camera, giving highlights and shadows more room before either blows out or turns to mud, and it's aimed squarely at people who plan to grade footage in post rather than shoot and post the same day.

The software leans the same direction. The upgraded DJI Mimo app adds Spotlight Follow subject tracking and one-tap footage transfer, and a new DaVinci Resolve plugin lets users import 360° files for professional editing, PetaPixel reports.

None of that changes the workflow T3 describes for 360 video generally. Its review calls the Osmo 360 II "brilliant but very niche," best suited to fast-moving sports like cycling, mountain biking, skateboarding, skiing, and sailboarding rather than everyday shooting. Editing 360° footage still means reframing an entire spherical image in specialized software like DJI Studio or Insta360 Studio, a process T3 describes bluntly as time-consuming. The replaceable-lens system solves a damage problem. It does nothing to shorten the editing bottleneck.

No confirmed ban appears in the available reporting. DJI's stated reason for the US availability gap, per PetaPixel, is that its authorization application "is still pending," language that describes a review still underway, not one that's been rejected. That's the regulatory equivalent of a permit application sitting in an inbox, not a rejection letter.

T3's review corroborates this independently: DJI has "no plans yet" for a US launch, but adds that the situation "may change." Both outlets describe an open process, not a permanent block.

What remains unknown is basic. DJI hasn't named the authorization it's seeking, when it applied, or why the review has stalled. Three developments would settle the question one way or another: a DJI statement naming the specific authorization, an FCC filing that identifies this model by name, or a confirmed US retail listing. None of those has surfaced yet.

The most reportable fact about the Osmo 360 II's US status is what's missing, not what's been decided. No named authorization, no model-specific filing, no retail listing. That gap, not a ban, is what currently separates American buyers from everyone else.

For creators already shooting 360 video, especially in fast-moving sports, the Osmo 360 II looks like a genuine upgrade over the original: tougher, quicker, and better in low light. For everyone else, the math hasn't changed. Spherical footage still demands specialized editing software no matter how many frames per second the sensor captures. American buyers, for now, are left watching for the same three signals that would turn "pending" into something more definite: a DJI statement naming the authorization, an FCC filing tied to this model by name, or a US retail listing that actually shows up.